Connect with us

Judiciary

NJC Recommends 12 New Justices for Court of Appeal, Adopts Policy on Retired Public Servants’ Eligibility for Judicial Appointment

Published

on

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended the appointment of 12 new Justices of the Court of Appeal to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Rising from its 111th meeting held on May 13, 2026, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, the Council also recommended one candidate for appointment as Judge of the High Court of Benue State and two candidates for appointment as Kadis of the Sharia Court of Appeal, Katsina State.

A statement issued late Thursday by the Deputy Director of Information of the NJC, Mrs. Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe, said the recommendations were intended to fill vacancies arising from the elevation and retirement of judicial officers across various levels of the judiciary and to strengthen the capacity of courts for effective justice delivery.

According to the statement, the judges recommended for elevation to the Court of Appeal bench are Justices Yakubu Abdulhammeed Mohammed, Abodunde Monisola Oluwatoyin, Ajuwa Raphael, Abua Elias Ojie, Ijohor Mbalamen Jennifer and Shuaibu Sabiu Bala.

Others are Justices Omotosho James Kolawole, Nwite Emeka, Buba Dauda Njane, Kado Sanusi Ademola, Enikuomehin and Dadom Julcit Veronica.

Justice Christine T. Clement Ende was recommended for appointment as a Judge of the Benue State High Court, while Ibrahim Abdullahi Yakubu and Bala Salisu Daura were recommended for appointment to the Sharia Court of Appeal, Katsina State.

The NJC spokesperson stated that the consideration of Messrs. Yakubu and Daura had earlier been stepped down in January 2026 following a petition by Tanimu Yusuf questioning their eligibility on account of prior retirement from public service. After due examination of the issues raised, the Council concluded its deliberations and approved their recommendation.

The NJC stated that all recommendations followed a rigorous selection process involving public scrutiny, evaluation of complaints received from stakeholders, and interviews conducted by a nine-member Interview Committee, in accordance with the 2023 Revised NJC Guidelines and Procedural Rules for the Appointment of Judicial Officers.

The Council also reaffirmed that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), does not prohibit retired public servants from judicial appointment.

The decision was further guided by judicial precedent, particularly Ayoola v. Baruwa (1999), where the Court of Appeal affirmed that no constitutional provision precludes a retired legal practitioner from appointment to the bench.

The statement read: “Under the newly adopted policy, a retired public servant must have a minimum of 10 years remaining in service before attaining the mandatory judicial retirement age; prospective candidates must disclose any criminal conviction; provide full employment history and reasons for leaving previous employment; declare existing employment obligations; and disclose financial status, including any circumstance of financial embarrassment.

“The Council noted that public service retirement may occur through voluntary retirement, compulsory retirement, or advised resignation, and observed that some officers retire upon attaining 50 years of age after completing 35 years of service. The requirement of a minimum remaining service period was introduced to ensure optimal institutional investment in judicial training and to promote continuity, stability and efficiency within the judiciary.”

The Council extended the acting appointment of Justice Ijeoma O. Agugua as Acting Chief Judge of Imo State for a further period of three months, from March 26, 2026, to June 26, 2026, to allow for the completion of the process for appointing a substantive Chief Judge.

The NJC commended Justice Ononeze-Madu for declining to be sworn in contrary to established constitutional procedure, describing the action as a demonstration of institutional integrity and respect for the rule of law.

It reiterated its call on the Imo State Judicial Service Commission to expedite the process of appointing a substantive Chief Judge in order to ensure stability, safeguard judicial independence and enhance the effective administration of justice in the state.

On disciplinary matters, the Council rejected appeals filed by eight judges of the Imo State judiciary seeking a reversal of their compulsory retirement from service over age falsification, having found that the affected judges failed to present fresh evidence capable of justifying a reversal of the sanctions imposed on them.

The judges include Justices B.C. Iheka, K.A. Leaweanya, Okereke Chinyere Ngozi, Innocent Chidi Ibeawuchi, Ofoha Uchenna, Everyman Eleanya, Rosemond Ibe and T.N. Nzeukwu.

However, the Council reinstated Justice T.I. Nze of the Customary Court of Appeal after His Lordship presented new evidence to the review committee, which the committee found to be authentic.

The affected judges were among 10 judicial officers recommended for compulsory retirement at the Council’s 109th meeting held on June 25, 2025.

The statement said nine of them were found to have altered their dates of birth in official records to unlawfully extend their years in service, while Justice T.N. Nzeukwu was found to have made himself available to be sworn in as Acting Chief Judge despite being fourth in the hierarchy of judges, contrary to Section 271(4) of the Constitution.

The Council also considered 13 investigation reports on petitions filed against judicial officers across the country over the handling of cases before them.

Following deliberations, the NJC dismissed eight petitions for lack of merit, want of diligent prosecution or for being statute-barred, while sanctions, including one-year suspension without pay, were imposed in two cases where misconduct was established.

Specifically, the Council suspended Justice Ibrahim D. Shekarau of the High Court of Nasarawa State for one year without pay for judicial misconduct involving the grant of an ex parte order in breach of Rules 3.1, 3.3 and 3.5 of the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2016.

The suspension followed a petition by Oluwafunke Obale Ozozoma over proceedings in Suit No. NSD/MG56M/2025.

The petitioner alleged that Justice Shekarau granted an ex parte order directing the transfer of ₦7 million from her bank account to a third party as a purported reversal of funds.

She contended that the ex parte application was filed, heard and granted on the same day without any substantive suit pending before the court, and that the order wrongly implied her involvement in fraud despite her not being charged or made a party to the proceedings.

She further alleged that the judge failed to verify the alleged erroneous transfer before making the order, thereby amounting to judicial misconduct.

The committee found that the judge acted in bad faith, failed to observe due process and demonstrated a lack of professional competence.

Similarly, the Council suspended Justice Edward A.E. Okpe of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory for one year without pay over allegations of breach of fair hearing in a matrimonial case.

The decision followed a petition filed by Mr. Sunday Emmanuel Oso, who accused the judge of bias and denial of fair hearing in Suit No. FCT/HC/PET/529/2024 between Lateefat Adeola Oso and Sunday Emmanuel Oso.

In the petition, Oso alleged that although he was served hearing notices fixing the matter for September 19, 2024, the court heard and granted an ex parte application on September 17, 2024, without notice to him.

He further alleged that when the matter later came up, the judge declined to hear the Motion on Notice and instead entertained committal proceedings against him based on alleged disobedience of the earlier ex parte order.

The committee found that Justice Okpe granted an ex parte application that led to committal proceedings against the petitioner without affording him the opportunity to be heard, contrary to Rule 3.3 of the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.

In another case, the Council dismissed a petition filed against Justice Charles N. Wali of the Rivers State High Court over allegations of misconduct linked to the Rivers State House of Assembly crisis.

The NJC found that the allegations were unsubstantiated and recommended that the petitioner, Daniel Chibuzor Amadi Esq., be referred to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee for disciplinary action over allegations described as reckless and unsupported by evidence.

The Council also deliberated on the report of 98 petitions submitted by its Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committees. Out of the petitions considered, 68 were dismissed for lack of merit, four judges were cautioned, one judge received a final warning, while 11 petitions were recommended for further investigation.

The Council further adopted reports suspending proceedings in some petitions on the grounds that the matters were sub judice.

Council also resolved to refer one Mbadiwe Ossai to the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) for investigation and prosecution for alleged perjury, while Adeboye Williams Adewale Esq., Dr. Peter N. Ekemezie Esq., Dr. Martin Odika Esq., and Muhammad Hamza Ahmad-Gana Esq. were referred to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee for writing frivolous and unsubstantiated petitions calculated to harass and intimidate judicial officers.

In a related development, one Yusuf Isa, described as a serial petitioner, was barred from further presenting petitions to the Council.

On judicial performance evaluation, the NJC commended nine judges for exemplary performance during the 2024 and 2025 legal years.

Two judges are to receive letters of commendation for delivering more than 21 considered judgments within the review period, while seven others will receive appreciation letters for commendable performance.

The Council also approved the issuance of 256 letters to judicial officers for various performance-related issues and approved the retirement of Justice Hamma Akawu Barka of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, who retired on April 17, 2026; Justice Amina Audi Wambai of the Court of Appeal, Makurdi Division, who will retire on July 6, 2026; and Justice Bello Mohammed Shinkafi of the High Court of Zamfara State, who will voluntarily retire on July 31, 2026.

The NJC expressed profound appreciation for their dedicated and meritorious service to the judiciary and the nation.

The Council also expressed regret over the deaths of three judicial officers between December 12, 2025, and April 1, 2026. They are Justice Godswill Vidal Obomanu of the High Court, Rivers State; Justice Bamidele Folarinle Adeyeye of the High Court, Ondo State; and Justice Yahaya Adamu of the High Court, Kogi State.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

BREAKING: Court Jails Chinese Nationals, Sentences Them to 50 Years for Illegal Export of Nigeria’s Lithium, Copper Minerals

Published

on

Justice Akintayo Aluko of the Federal High Court, Lagos, has convicted and sentenced two Chinese nationals, Zhang Hong Lin and Gao Pei Hai, to 25 years’ imprisonment each for conspiring to illegally export Nigeria’s mineral resources.

The judge convicted the two defendants on all five counts preferred against them and sentenced each of them to 25 years’ imprisonment on Counts 1 to 5, with an option of a ₦10 million fine on each count.

Counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), H. U. Kofarnaisa, had arraigned the two defendants on Friday on a five-count charge.

Justice Aluko further ordered that the sentences should commence from the date of their arrest.

He also ordered the forfeiture of all the mineral resources involved in the case to the Federal Government.

The two convicts were arraigned alongside Gao Pei Yu, who remains at large, on a five-count charge bordering on conspiracy, unlawful possession, and the attempted exportation of strategic mineral resources without lawful authority.

According to the charge filed before the Federal High Court on May 28, 2025, the defendants conspired in Lagos to defraud the Federal Government of revenue accruing from the country’s solid mineral resources by attempting to export mica products, copper-bearing minerals, and lithium-bearing minerals without the approval of the appropriate authorities.

The prosecution alleged that the offences contravened Section 1(8)(a) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act, 1983.

The remaining counts alleged that, on May 9, 2025, the defendants unlawfully possessed various mineral resources intended for export without lawful authority, contrary to Section 8(b) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act, 1983.

The minerals listed in the charge included muscovite and lepidolite, both mica minerals; spodumene and petalite, which are lithium-bearing ores; as well as anhydrite, quartz, magnesite, bornite, and cuprite, which are associated with copper-bearing mineral resources.

After reviewing the evidence, Justice Aluko found that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the first and second defendants.

He consequently convicted them on all five counts, imposed the custodial sentences and fine options, and ordered the forfeiture of the seized mineral resources to the Federal Government.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Court Jails Yahoo Boys’ Middleman, Four Men for Money Laundering, Illegal Forex Trading

Published

on

Justice Akintayo Aluko of the Federal High Court, sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Thursday, July 30, 2026, convicted and sentenced Sunmonu Olasunkanmi Thaoban to four years’ imprisonment for money laundering.

Sunmonu was arraigned by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the EFCC on a two-count charge bordering on money laundering.

One of the counts reads: “That you, Sunmonu Thaoban Olasunkanmi, sometime in 2023, in Lagos and within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, whilst acting as a middleman, indirectly disguised the origin of the sum of ₦16,000,000 (Sixteen Million Naira), being illicit gains accrued from your unlawful act, by converting same to a black G-Wagon Jeep, 2018 model, with chassis number 1C4HJWEGJL893461, which vehicle forms part of the proceeds of your unlawful activity, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(2)(a) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.”

The defendant pleaded guilty to both counts.

Following his guilty plea, the prosecution counsel, H. U. Kofarnaisa, reviewed the facts of the case and urged the court to convict and sentence him accordingly.

Justice Aluko found Sunmonu guilty and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment, with an option of a ₦1.8 million fine.

The court also ordered the forfeiture of the convict’s black G-Wagon Jeep and mobile device to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

In a related development, the court also convicted and sentenced four Bureau de Change (BDC) operators to 12 months’ imprisonment each for engaging in illegal foreign exchange transactions.

The convicts—Umar Muhammad Lamido, Yusuf Musa Yusuf, Abdulmuhimin Mahmud, and Muhammed Musa—were prosecuted by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ikoyi, on separate one-count charges bordering on illegal foreign exchange operations.

One of the charges against Abdulmuhimin Mahmud reads: “That you, Abdulmumin Mahmud, on the 23rd of July, 2026, in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, engaged in a foreign exchange transaction other than through the official foreign exchange market and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 11(1)(a) of the National Economic Intelligence Committee Establishment (Etc.) Act, 1994, and punishable under Section 11(2) of the same Act.”

The defendants pleaded guilty to their respective charges.

Following their guilty pleas, the prosecution counsel, H. U. Kofarnaisa, reviewed the facts of the cases and urged the court to convict and sentence them accordingly.

Justice Aluko convicted the four defendants and sentenced each of them to 12 months’ imprisonment, with an option of a ₦100,000 fine.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Agidingbi Land Row: Family Accuses OORBDA of Defying Supreme Court Judgment

Published

on

The Akinole-Oshiun Family has rejected the Ogun-Oshun River Basin Development Authority’s (OORBDA) claim to an 8,000-square-metre parcel of land along Lateef Jakande Road, Agidingbi, Ikeja, Lagos, insisting that the property has already been vested in the family by judgments of the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court.

The family made the assertion in a rejoinder dated July 31, 2026, in response to OORBDA’s public disclaimer published on Page 12 of The Punch newspaper of July 29, 2026, in which the authority claimed ownership of the property known as “AY Homes Luxury Court.”

Signed by the Head of the Family, Chief Isiaka Lamina Akiti Akinole, and the Family Secretary, Hon. Fatai Abayomi Gbadebo Oshiun, the rejoinder described OORBDA’s publication as “erroneous” and “misleading,” saying it was issued to set the record straight and prevent what it described as falsehood from gaining public acceptance.

According to the family, the disputed property forms part of about 398 acres of land in and around Agidingbi, which it said had been conclusively declared its property through judgments of the High Court of Lagos State, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court.

The family cited the decisions in Suit No. ID/216/77L, Appeal Nos. CA/L/517M/99, CA/L/649M/06, and CA/L/776/2014, as well as the Supreme Court judgment in SC/173/2009, which it said affirmed its legal and beneficial ownership of the land.

It further stated that, following the judgments, it obtained a writ of possession, which was executed by the Deputy Sheriff of the High Court of Lagos State in April 2019 in the presence of officers of the Nigeria Police Force, after which a Form “O” certifying the execution was issued.

The family also recalled that the execution of the writ prompted the Lagos State House of Assembly’s Committee on Rules and Business to conduct a public hearing on a petition over alleged illegal allocations of land covered by the Supreme Court judgment.

According to the rejoinder, officials of OORBDA participated in the hearing alongside other stakeholders, after which the Assembly resolved that the Lagos State Government should comply with the court judgments by recognising the family as the lawful owner of the 398-acre land and granting it unhindered access to the property.

The family further claimed that the Lagos State Government subsequently recognised its ownership by issuing land allocation documents, survey plans, building permits, and planning approvals covering plots within the Alausa Central Business District and along Lateef Jakande Road, including the disputed property.

It argued that OORBDA’s disclaimer was contemptuous of the subsisting judgments of superior courts and inconsistent with the state’s recognition of the family’s title.

The family also dismissed the Certificate of Occupancy displayed by OORBDA in its publication, contending that it could not supersede valid court judgments affirming the family’s ownership.

Urging members of the public, subscribers, consultants, agents, and other stakeholders to disregard OORBDA’s disclaimer, the family described the publication as self-serving, misleading, and capable of causing confusion and disrupting public peace in Agidingbi and its environs.

The rejoinder marks the latest development in the ownership dispute over the prime Agidingbi property. OORBDA had earlier warned the public against dealing with the land, maintaining that it belongs to the authority.

Efforts to obtain OORBDA’s response to the family’s rejoinder were unsuccessful as of the time this report was filed.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 JaraJournal.