Connect with us

Crime & Justice

Sting Operation at OOPL: Court Jails Two More Internet Fraudsters in Lagos

Published

on

The Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Thursday, August 21, 2025, secured the conviction and sentence of the duo of Asimiyu Oluwaponmile Olatunji and Hassan Makinde for internet fraud before Justice D.I.Dipeolu of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos.

They are among the 93 suspected fraudsters arrested during a sting operation on Sunday, August 10, 2025 at a hotel within the precincts of Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library, OOPL, Abeokuta, Ogun State.

The suspects were arraigned on Thursday on one-count separate charges bordering on impersonation, identity and internet fraud.

One of the charges reads: “That you, ASIMIYU OLUWAPONMILE OLATUNJI (male) sometime in August, 2025, at Lagos, within the Lagos jurisdiction of the Federal High Court of Nigeria, fraudulently opened a Facebook Account with the name Janet Milner, and held out yourself as such, and deceitfully obtained the sum of $350 (Three Hundred and Fifty United State Dollars), thereby committing an offence, contrary to and punishable under Section 22 (3)(a) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition etc.) Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2015.”

They each pleaded “guilty” to the charges when they were read to them.

In view of their guilty pleas, prosecution counsel, Pereagbe Ebareotu and S.M.Yabo, reviewed the facts of the cases, respectively.

The prosecution counsel, thereafter, respectively sought to tender, in evidence, the extra-judicial statements of the defendants; Olatunji’s iPhone 12 and N350,000 manager’s cheque issued as restitution ; Makinde’s iPhone 16 as well as the forensic investigation documents printed from their mobile devices.

They were all admitted as exhibits by the court.

The judge, in view of the defendants’ guilty pleas and evidence tendered by the prosecution, found them guilty and convicted them accordingly.

The defence counsel, respectively, most passionately prayed the court to “ temper justice with mercy,” and grant their clients non- custodial sentences, adding that they were first-time offenders who have shown remorse.

Delivering judgment, Justice Dipeolu convicted and sentenced Olatunji, who confessed to have benefited the sum of $350 ( Three Hundred and Fifty United States Dollars) to three months imprisonment , with an option of fine of N500,000( Five Hundred Thousand Naira).

The judge also ordered that the mobile device recovered from him as well as the N350,000 manager’s cheque raised as restitution be forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

Justice Dipeolu also convicted and sentenced Makinde , who confessed to have benefited $10,000 Australian Dollars , translating to N1.5m from his criminal activities, to three months
imprisonment, with an option of fine of N500,000 ( Five Hundred Naira ).

The iPhone 16 recovered from him was ordered forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

Crime & Justice

Court Jails Fake Spiritualist for Sextortion in Abuja

Published

on

Continue Reading

Crime & Justice

Immigration Intercepts Two With ₦34m Allegedly Meant For Kidnap Ransom

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) has intercepted two persons in Adamawa State with ₦34 million in cash, with the suspects allegedly linked to a kidnapping syndicate.

The suspects were intercepted with the cash during an operation in the state.

The Comptroller of Immigration Service, Sani Sule-Jega, disclosed this at a media briefing in Yola, the Adamawa State capital.

According to him, preliminary investigations showed that the suspects claimed the money was intended to pay ransom for their abducted brother.

In a separate operation, the Adamawa State Command of the NIS also intercepted 17 irregular migrants at Rumde Baruw in Yola North Local Government Area of the state.

The undocumented migrants were intercepted at a private three-bedroom residence during an operation by officers of the command.

Sule-Jega said preliminary profiling showed that 13 of the migrants were Cameroonian nationals, comprising eight males and five females, while the remaining four were Chadian nationals, all males.

The Comptroller noted a shift in the accommodation pattern of undocumented migrants, particularly their increasing use of private and unregistered apartments instead of conventional lodging facilities such as hotels.

He said the service was intensifying surveillance and intelligence-led operations to identify and address emerging patterns of irregular migration in the state.

Sule-Jega reiterated the command’s commitment to safeguarding Nigeria’s territorial integrity, improving migration management and strengthening border security.

He urged members of the public to remain vigilant and provide credible information that could assist security agencies in maintaining peace and security across the state.

The suspects and recovered cash have been taken into custody for further investigation and necessary action in accordance with established procedures and applicable laws.

The Comptroller General of Immigration has directed that the suspects and exhibits be handed over to the Nigeria Police Force for further investigation.

Continue Reading

Crime & Justice

Court Adjourns KC Luxury’s Detention Challenge as NDLEA Says Bail Possible

Published

on

Justice Friday Ogazi of the Federal High Court, Lagos, on Wednesday adjourned until September 21, 2026, the hearing of pending applications in the case involving detained businessman and social media influencer, Afolabi Kazeem Michael, popularly known as KC Luxury.

The adjournment followed submissions by counsel to Kazeem, Abdulakeem Labi-Lawal, SAN, and counsel to the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), Abu Ibrahim, that the court should await the ruling of a sister court on an application challenging its jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

At the proceedings, Labi-Lawal told the court that although the NDLEA had obtained an order authorising it to keep Kazeem in custody for 30 days to conduct further investigations, the order did not expressly mandate that he remain detained throughout the entire period.

The senior lawyer further submitted that the NDLEA could release his client on bail if it was satisfied with the progress of its investigation.

The lawyer explained that Kazeem had challenged the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to grant the detention order, adding that the application had already been argued and the parties were awaiting the court’s ruling.

He urged Justice Ogazi to adjourn the matter to enable the parties to respond to the processes already filed.

Labi-Lawal noted that the respondents had served their counter-affidavit on the applicant’s legal team and that the applicant had five days within which to respond.

Ibrahim, counsel to the NDLEA, did not oppose the application for adjournment but clarified that the 30-day remand order was obtained in August, before Kazeem subsequently approached the court seeking an order for his production.

Justice Ogazi consequently adjourned the matter until September 21 for further proceedings.

Kazeem, through his lawyers led by Labi-Lawal, is challenging the legality of the August 20, 2026, ex parte order authorising his detention for 30 days in the first instance for further investigation into allegations of drug trafficking.

In the application filed in Suit No. FHC/LAG/MISC/1199/2026, the defence is asking the court to set aside or discharge the order on the grounds that no criminal charge had been filed against Kazeem.

The lawyers argued that the Federal High Court’s jurisdiction to try offences under the NDLEA Act is distinct from its power to make a pre-charge remand order.

According to them, the fact that the Federal High Court has jurisdiction to try offences under the NDLEA Act does not automatically confer on it the power to remand an uncharged suspect merely to allow investigators more time to complete their investigation.

“The jurisdiction to try a person charged with an offence under the NDLEA Act is fundamentally different from the jurisdiction to remand a suspect who has not yet been charged,” the lawyers submitted.

The defence has also challenged the duration of the detention, arguing that the 30-day order is contrary to the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015.

The lawyers relied on Sections 293 to 299 of the ACJA, which provide the statutory framework for pre-charge remand.

They specifically cited Section 296(1), which provides that an initial remand order shall be for a period not exceeding 14 days in the first instance.

The defence argued that the use of the words “shall,” “not exceeding” and “in the first instance” leaves no discretion for a court to substitute 30 days for the statutory maximum of 14 days.

They argued that where investigators require additional time to keep a suspect in custody, the law requires further judicial scrutiny rather than permitting a single, uninterrupted 30-day detention order.

Kazeem’s lawyers have also asked the court to abridge the time for hearing the application and bring forward the September 17 date earlier fixed for the review of the detention order.

They argued that allowing the detention to continue could amount to an ongoing infringement of Kazeem’s constitutional right to personal liberty and render his challenge to the detention order nugatory.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 JaraJournal.