Connect with us

News

Senate Passes Electoral Act Amendment Bill

Published

on

The Senate on Tuesday passed the Electoral Act, 2022 (Repeal and Re-Enactment) Bill, 2026.

Before its passage, the upper chamber witnessed a rowdy session as proceedings resumed with a demand for division over Clause 60 raised by Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe (ADC, Abia South).

The Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, stated that he believed the demand had previously been withdrawn, but several opposition senators immediately objected.

Citing Order 52(6), the Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin, argued that it would be out of order to revisit any provision on which the Senate President had already ruled.

This submission sparked another uproar in the chamber, during which Senator Sunday Karimi had a brief face-off with Abaribe.

The Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, reminded lawmakers that he had sponsored the motion for rescission, stressing that decisions previously taken by the Senate were no longer valid following the motion.

He maintained that, consistent with his motion, Abaribe’s demand was in order.

Akpabio further suggested that the call for division was merely an attempt by Abaribe to publicly demonstrate his stance.

The Senate President sustained the point of order, after which Abaribe rose in protest and was urged to formally move his motion.

Rising under Order 72(1), Abaribe called for a division on Clause 60(3), particularly concerning the provision that where electronic transmission of results fails, Form EC8A should not serve as the sole basis for collation. He called for the removal of the proviso allowing manual transmission of results in the event of network failure.

During the division, Akpabio directed senators who supported the caveat to stand. He then asked those opposed to it to rise.

Fifteen opposition senators stood in opposition.

However, after counting the votes, the Senate President announced that 15 senators voted against the proviso, while 55 senators voted in support of it.

Earlier, proceedings were momentarily stalled as lawmakers began clause-by-clause consideration of the Electoral Act, 2022 (Repeal and Re-Enactment) Bill, 2026, following a motion to rescind the earlier amendment.

The motion to rescind the bill was formally seconded on Tuesday, paving the way for the Senate to dissolve into the Committee of the Whole for detailed reconsideration and re-enactment of the proposed legislation.

During the session, Akpabio reeled out the clauses one after another for deliberation.

However, the process stalled at Clause 60 when Abaribe raised a point of order, drawing immediate attention on the floor.

Following his intervention, murmurs spread across the chamber as lawmakers gathered in small groups and approached the Senate President’s desk for consultations.

The Senate subsequently moved into a closed-door session.

Before rescinding the Electoral Act, the red chamber had raised concerns over the timing of the 2027 general elections and certain technical inconsistencies in the legislation.

Rising under Order 52(6) of the Senate Standing Orders, the Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, moved the motion to reverse the earlier passage of the bill and return it to the Committee of the Whole for fresh deliberations.

He explained that the development followed the announcement by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of a timetable fixing the 2027 general elections for February 2027, after consultations with the leadership of the National Assembly.

According to him, stakeholders had raised concerns that the proposed date conflicted with provisions of the amended law, particularly the requirement that elections be scheduled not later than 360 days before the expiration of tenure.

He further noted that a critical review of the passed bill showed that the 360-day notice requirement prescribed in Clause 28 could result in the scheduling of the 2027 Presidential and National Assembly elections during the Ramadan period.

He warned that holding elections during Ramadan could negatively affect voter turnout, logistical coordination, stakeholder participation, and the overall inclusiveness and credibility of the electoral process.

The motion also highlighted discrepancies discovered in the Long Title and several clauses of the bill, including Clauses 6, 9, 10, 22, 23, 28, 29, 32, 42, 47, 51, 60, 62, 64, 65, 73, 77, 86, 87, 89, 93, and 143. The identified issues reportedly affected cross-referencing, serial numbering, and internal consistency within the legislation.

News

BREAKING: NAICOM Cancels Universal Insurance Plc’s Registration, Appoints Receiver/Provisional Liquidator

Published

on

The National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) has cancelled the certificate of registration of Universal Insurance Plc and appointed a receiver/provisional liquidator to commence the process of winding up the affairs of the insurance company.

The cancellation, which took effect on August 14, 2026, followed the company’s failure to meet the prescribed Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) applicable to its category of licence within the stipulated compliance period.

In a notice dated August 13, 2026, and addressed to the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Universal Insurance Plc, NAICOM said the cancellation was effected pursuant to the powers conferred on the Commission by the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act (NIIRA) 2025.

The Commission consequently appointed Ogbonna Chukwumerije, a Partner at Pinheiro LP, as Receiver/Provisional Liquidator of the company.

According to the appointment letter dated August 14, 2026, Chukwumerije is required to immediately trace, recover, secure and take over the assets of Universal Insurance Plc.

He is also mandated to collate and settle the liabilities of the company in accordance with the provisions of NIIRA 2025, liaise with NAICOM on information available to the Commission, and submit periodic reports on the progress of the process.

NAICOM said the appointment was subject to the receiver signing a Deed of Appointment and complying with the terms of engagement and extant rules governing receivership and liquidation.

In a separate public notice signed by Chukwumerije and dated August 18, 2026, the receiver formally notified banks, financial institutions, policyholders, creditors, debtors, customers and members of the public of the company’s receivership.

The notice said the receiver had been appointed following the cancellation of Universal Insurance’s licence by NAICOM on account of its failure to meet the applicable Minimum Capital Requirement.

Chukwumerije said that, pursuant to NIIRA 2025 and the terms of his appointment, he was empowered to take over the management and control of Universal Insurance Plc.

He was also authorised to trace, recover, secure and take possession of all assets belonging to the company, as well as take necessary steps for their preservation, protection and realisation.

The receiver is further required to collate, verify and settle the company’s liabilities in accordance with NIIRA 2025, other applicable laws and NAICOM directives.

He is also to liaise with NAICOM on matters relating to the liquidation and winding-up of the company’s affairs and submit periodic reports to the Commission on the progress and administration of the liquidation process.

The development has also triggered restrictions on dealings with the company’s accounts and affairs.

In the public notice, banks, financial institutions, policyholders, creditors, debtors, agents, customers and members of the public were directed to exercise caution and not honour, process, recognise or act upon any instruction, mandate, request, payment direction, withdrawal instruction, transfer instruction or other communication purportedly issued on behalf of Universal Insurance Plc.

Such instructions, the receiver said, would only be recognised where they were issued by him or by a person expressly authorised in writing by him.

The receiver further directed all persons and institutions dealing with the company’s assets, funds, records, policies, claims, liabilities or affairs to verify the authority of anyone purporting to act for or on behalf of Universal Insurance during the liquidation process.

He said only instructions bearing his official seal and stamp as a Legal Practitioner and Receiver/Provisional Liquidator, or instructions issued by persons duly authorised by him in writing, would be recognised in connection with the affairs and liquidation of the company.

The public notice also warned individuals and institutions against acting on instructions purportedly emanating from Universal Insurance Plc, its former officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives unless such instructions had been duly authorised by the receiver.

It further required anyone in possession, custody or control of any asset, fund, document, book, record, policy, claim or other property belonging to or relating to the company to cooperate fully with the receiver and comply with all lawful requests and directives issued in furtherance of the liquidation.

According to the receiver, the notice would take immediate effect and remain in force throughout the liquidation process, subject to any further directive or notice issued by NAICOM or the Receiver/Provisional Liquidator.

He said the receivership process was being conducted with the objective of safeguarding the company’s assets and ensuring that valid claims were properly identified, assessed and dealt with in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

The documents did not disclose the total value of Universal Insurance’s outstanding liabilities, the number of policyholders affected or the value of assets to be recovered.

The development is expected to trigger a process of identifying the company’s assets and liabilities and determining the status of outstanding obligations to policyholders, creditors and other stakeholders.

Universal Insurance Plc’s licence cancellation comes against the backdrop of NAICOM’s enforcement of the minimum capital requirements applicable to insurance companies under the current regulatory framework.

The receiver’s appointment formally transfers responsibility for managing the company’s affairs and dealing with its assets and liabilities to the appointed receiver, subject to the provisions of NIIRA 2025 and the oversight of NAICOM.

The Commission’s appointment letter was signed by Olusegun Ayo Omosehin, Commissioner for Insurance/Chief Executive Officer of NAICOM.

The receiver’s public notice was dated August 18, 2026.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Kasunmu’s Death Elevates Folake Solanke as Most Senior Living SAN, BOSAN Vice-Chair – Pinheiro

Published

on

The death of renowned legal scholar and advocate, Professor Alfred Bandele Kasunmu, SAN, has altered the hierarchy of seniority within Nigeria’s legal profession, with Chief Folake Solanke, SAN, emerging as the most senior living Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

Kasunmu, who died at the age of 92, was, until his death, the most senior living Senior Advocate of Nigeria and, by virtue of that distinction, the statutory Vice-Chairman of the Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN).

According to a tribute by Chief Kemi Pinheiro, OFR, SAN, LLD, FCIArb., the position now falls to Solanke, herself one of the most distinguished figures in the Nigerian Bar.

Pinheiro described Kasunmu’s position as a measure of the exceptional stature he attained within the legal profession over several decades.

“With his passing, that distinction and position now fall on Chief Folake Solanke, SAN, herself a towering figure of the Nigerian Bar,” Pinheiro stated.

He described Kasunmu as a “living institution of the Nigerian Bar”, whose name commanded respect in the courtroom, the academy, and the administration of justice.

Kasunmu’s legal career spanned advocacy, academia, and public service. He was a formidable advocate, distinguished scholar, former Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice of Lagos State, and Professor of Law at Obafemi Awolowo University and the University of Lagos.

Beyond his professional titles, Pinheiro described him as “a lawyer’s lawyer” and “a gentleman through and through”, stressing that his influence extended far beyond the courtroom.

He said Kasunmu was renowned for his formidable command of the law, intellectual rigour, and celebrated photographic memory, while his commitment to mentoring generations of Nigerian lawyers and judges remained one of his most enduring legacies.

Recalling his courtroom encounters with the late legal giant, Pinheiro said Kasunmu’s advocacy was characterised by precision, penetrating questions, and an ability to dismantle an opponent’s case without losing his wit or composure.

He particularly recalled the case Dioudonne Donnie Ngnoumen v. Texaco Overseas, in which Kasunmu represented the opposing side and conducted what Pinheiro described as a devastating cross-examination.

“There was theatre in his advocacy; there was intellect in every question; there was purpose behind every pause,” Pinheiro said.

He, however, noted that the Kasunmu he remembered most was not merely the formidable advocate he encountered in court, but the friend who stood beside him during a difficult period of his career.

Pinheiro said Kasunmu’s passing represented a major loss to the Nigerian Bar, academia, and the administration of justice.

“Today, the Bar has lost one of its finest forensic minds; the academy has lost a distinguished teacher; the legal profession has lost one of its great repositories of knowledge and experience,” he said.

He added that Kasunmu’s ultimate legacy would not be measured merely by the titles he accumulated, but by the lives he strengthened and the generations of lawyers he influenced.

Kasunmu, he said, might have taken his “final bow”, but his contributions to the legal profession would endure.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: NAICOM Revokes Nigeria Reinsurance Corporation’s Licence, Appoints Muiz Banire as Receiver/Provisional Liquidator

Published

on

The National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) has revoked the operating licence of Nigeria Reinsurance Corporation over its failure to meet the statutory Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) and appointed Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Dr. Muiz Banire, SAN, OON, as Receiver/Provisional Liquidator to oversee the winding-up of the company’s affairs.

The appointment took effect on August 3, 2026, following the cancellation of the corporation’s certificate of registration by the insurance regulator.

In a public notice dated August 4, 2026, Banire stated that he was appointed by NAICOM, in the exercise of its statutory powers, to take charge of the receivership and liquidation of Nigeria Reinsurance Corporation (RR-002).

According to the notice, the company’s licence was revoked after it failed to comply with the prescribed Minimum Capital Requirement applicable to its category of licence within the stipulated compliance period, in accordance with the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act (NIIRA), 2025, and other extant laws, regulations, and guidelines.

Banire stated that his appointment empowers him to immediately trace, recover, secure, and take possession of all assets belonging to the company; collate and settle its liabilities in accordance with the NIIRA 2025; liaise with NAICOM on matters relating to the liquidation; and submit periodic reports to the Commission.

He also directed banks, financial institutions, insurance policyholders, creditors, and members of the public not to honour any instruction relating to the company except those issued by him or by persons expressly authorised by him.

As part of the liquidation process, Banire announced that all bank accounts belonging to Nigeria Reinsurance Corporation had been frozen with immediate effect pending further directives from his office.

He warned that any transaction carried out without his authorisation would be at the risk of the parties involved.

“Members of the general public, banks, and financial institutions in Nigeria are hereby informed that no financial transactions should be conducted pursuant to any instruction from anyone except those that I issue as the Receiver/Provisional Liquidator,” the notice stated.

According to him, only instructions bearing his official seal and stamp as a legal practitioner, or those issued by persons duly authorised by him, will be recognised throughout the liquidation process.

The regulatory action marks a significant enforcement measure by NAICOM and underscores the Commission’s resolve to ensure that insurance and reinsurance companies operating in Nigeria comply with statutory capital requirements designed to protect policyholders and strengthen the financial stability of the industry.

The liquidation process is expected to involve the recovery and realisation of the company’s assets, the verification and settlement of valid claims and liabilities, and the orderly winding-up of its affairs in accordance with the provisions of the law.

The public notice serves as formal notification to policyholders, creditors, banks, and other stakeholders that all dealings concerning Nigeria Reinsurance Corporation must henceforth be channelled through the Receiver/Provisional Liquidator until the liquidation process is concluded.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 JaraJournal.