Connect with us

Judiciary

JUST IN: Court Sentences Former Minister Saleh Mamman to 75 Years Imprisonment Over ₦33.8bn Fraud in Absentia

Published

on

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja on Wednesday sentenced former Minister of Power, Saleh Mamman, to a total of 75 years imprisonment on a 12-count charge of money laundering involving ₦33.8 billion linked to the Zungeru and Mambilla hydroelectric power projects.

The trial judge, Justice James Omotosho, handed down the sentence after finding Mamman, who was absent from court, guilty on all 12 counts of conspiracy and money laundering brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Justice Omotosho said the absence of the former minister in court on Wednesday and on the last adjourned date was a deliberate attempt to obstruct the course of justice.

The judge, who agreed with the EFCC’s counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, that the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, empower the court to proceed with sentencing despite the defendant’s absence, held that Mamman could not claim to have suffered a miscarriage of justice.

Consequently, the court sentenced the convict to seven years imprisonment each on Counts 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, without the option of fine.

Justice Omotosho also sentenced him to a three-year jail term on Count 4, with an option of a ₦10 million fine, and two years imprisonment on Count 5 without the option of fine.

The judge ordered that the sentences run consecutively and commence from the date of his arrest.

He further directed all security agencies within and outside Nigeria, including INTERPOL, to arrest Mamman wherever he is found and hand him over to the Nigerian Correctional Service to begin serving his sentence.

Based on an application by the prosecution, which was not opposed by Mamman’s counsel, Mohammed Ahmed, Justice Omotosho also ordered the final forfeiture of two properties belonging to the convict located in choice areas of Abuja, as well as monies recovered in different currencies by the anti-graft agency.

The judge further ordered that the outstanding balance between the monies and assets recovered from Mamman and the ₦22 billion the prosecution established during trial, out of the alleged ₦33.8 billion siphoned from the Zungeru and Mambilla Hydroelectric Power projects, be refunded by the convict.

Justice Omotosho had, on May 7, convicted Mamman on the 12-count charge filed by the EFCC and adjourned till Wednesday, May 13, for sentencing following his absence in court and the issuance of a warrant for his arrest.

In the judgment, the court held that the EFCC had proved its case against the former minister beyond reasonable doubt, as required by law.

The judge held that the prosecution established that at least ₦22 billion was siphoned by the defendant and his associates.

“This is sufficient to sustain the charge. Consequently, the defendant is hereby convicted on Count 1 of the charge.

“The defence did not offer any credible evidence to rebut the prosecution’s evidence. Upon the unchallenged evidence of the prosecution, the court hereby convicts the defendant on Count 1 of the charge,” Justice Omotosho held.

The judge added that Mamman’s diversion of funds meant for critical projects such as the Zungeru and Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Projects for personal use was “an eyesore.”

Justice Omotosho observed that although the burden of proof in criminal matters is high, the EFCC successfully discharged that burden beyond reasonable doubt. He noted that some EFCC witnesses testified on how funds budgeted for the power projects were diverted under various disguises on the instructions of the former minister.

“The sheer greed of the defendant and his comrades in crime is nothing but downright shameful. For a defendant who held such a critical position as Minister of Power, rather than focusing on creating a legacy by solving the epileptic power supply in the country, he began siphoning and converting funds meant for serious projects into private pockets.

“The defendant was living large at the expense of ordinary Nigerians who had suffered from the consequences of his malfeasance. Little wonder Nigeria has remained in darkness,” the judge said.

“In final analysis, the prosecution has established the 12-count charge against the defendant beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, he is hereby convicted as charged,” Justice Omotosho held.

Shortly after the conviction, prosecution counsel Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, who is also the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation (DPPF), urged the court to issue a warrant for the arrest of the convict, who was absent from court without explanation when judgment was delivered.

Oyedepo argued that the defence failed to provide credible evidence, such as a medical report, to support claims that the convict was ill.

Earlier, counsel to the convict, Mohammed Ahmed, told the court that he had not had access to his client since Tuesday, when he received notice of the judgment.

He, however, appealed for an adjournment to allow his client present himself in court, adding that if Mamman failed to appear on the next adjourned date, the court could then issue a warrant for his arrest.

When asked by the judge when the defendant could be contacted, Ahmed said he would reach out to the former minister’s personal assistant.

He added that one of Mamman’s associates informed him that the former minister was ill, which accounted for his absence in court.

Justice Omotosho subsequently ordered that the former minister be produced in court on the adjourned date for sentencing and adjourned the matter till May 13 after finding him guilty as charged.

The EFCC, in July 2024, arraigned Mamman on allegations of money laundering and conspiracy involving officials of the Ministry of Power and some private companies in the alleged diversion of ₦33.8 billion meant for the Zungeru and Mambilla Hydroelectric Power projects.

The former minister pleaded not guilty to the charges. In the course of the trial, the EFCC called 17 witnesses and tendered 43 exhibits before closing its case.

Mamman, through his lawyer, Femi Atteh, SAN, did not call any witness in his defence but instead filed a no-case submission, which the court dismissed in December 2025.

In dismissing the application, the judge held that the EFCC had established a prima facie case against the former minister and that the evidence presented required him to enter a defence, particularly considering the gravity of the allegations.

Mamman was appointed Minister of Power by former President Muhammadu Buhari in August 2019 and was relieved of his duties in September 2021.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EFCC

Alleged $6bn Mambilla Project Fraud: Witness Clarifies Certification of FEC Meeting Extracts

Published

on

The Fifth Prosecution Witness (PW5) in the trial of former Minister of Power, Olu Agunloye, on Wednesday, June 10, 2026, clarified issues surrounding the certification of the extract of the minutes of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting of May 21, 2003, before Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Apo, Abuja, following a formal request by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for certified extracts of the meeting.

The former minister is facing prosecution on an amended seven-count charge bordering on alleged official corruption and the fraudulent award of the Mambilla Power Project contract worth $6 billion to Sunrise Power Transmission Company Limited.

The witness, Iliya John Iyakwari, an Assistant Director of Legal in the Federal Ministry of Justice, currently serving in the Federal Ministry of Power as an Assistant Legal Adviser since August 2014, stated during cross-examination by defence counsel, Adeola Adedipe, SAN, that the request for a certified copy of the extract of the FEC meeting of May 21, 2003, was received from the EFCC in July 2023.

He explained that the certification was eventually done in 2024 because, upon receipt of the request letter from the User Department, the Legal Department forwarded a memo to the EFCC dated July 27, 2023, but the initial copy sent to the Commission was not certified, prompting the EFCC to return it.

“It was after it was received by the EFCC in July 2023 that they realised the extract was not certified. So, in January 2024, a staff of the EFCC brought back Exhibit Three K to my Legal Adviser, and the name of the EFCC staff is Babangida.

“He brought it personally and reminded my director that it was not certified. My director then gave me the document to certify. That is why my lord will see on the face of the document that the date it was certified, January 26, 2024, is different from the date it was forwarded. It was in the process of certification that I mistakenly stamped the original forwarding letter dated June 27, 2023. After stamping the document, I gave it back to my director, who I believe handed it over to Babangida because I left them afterwards,” he said.

When asked whether his earlier testimony suggesting certification in June 2023 was contradictory, prosecution counsel, Abba Mohammed, SAN, defended the witness’ position, insisting that the testimony was not contradictory and that court records spoke for themselves.

“My lord, I object to this particular question anchored on Exhibit PW5A, which was just tendered in court. What I see in our record, and what I believe is reflected in the records of the court, is that in his explanation, he summarised that all these activities were done in June 2023; he never said the certification was done in 2023.

“This objection is founded on Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which is superior to the Evidence Act. We will rely on the record of the court, particularly line 16,” he said.

The witness was also asked whether the document tendered in court by Babangida during his testimony was a different extract of the FEC meeting from the one he certified.

The prosecution counsel again objected, arguing that the witness, in line with court procedure, was absent from the courtroom during Babangida’s testimony and therefore could not be cross-examined on a document that was not tendered through him. He cited the case of Buhari v. INEC & Others (2008).

Justice Onwuegbuzie adjourned the matter until June 18 and July 2, 2026, for the continuation of trial.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Alleged ₦2bn Nigeria Air Fraud: How Sirika Allegedly Used Ethiopian Airlines as Fake Nigeria Air – Witness

Published

on

The 12th Prosecution Witness (PW12), Christopher Odofin, in the trial of former Minister of Aviation, Hadi Abubakar Sirika, on Wednesday, June 10, 2026, told Justice S.C. Oriji of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Abuja, how Sirika allegedly passed off an aircraft belonging to Ethiopian Airlines as the promised Nigeria Air by the government of the late President Muhammadu Buhari.

The decoy aircraft, adorned with the livery of the proposed Nigeria Air, landed on the tarmac of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on May 27, 2023, three days before the expiration of the Buhari administration, and was flown back to Addis Ababa on the morning of May 29, 2023, the handover date to the succeeding government.

Hadi Sirika is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on an amended six-count charge bordering on alleged abuse of office and misappropriation of public funds amounting to over ₦2 billion, alongside his daughter, Fatima Hadi Sirika; son-in-law, Hamma Jalal Sule; and Al Buraq Global Investment Limited.

The contract for the establishment of Nigeria Air was awarded to Tianaero Nigeria Limited, a company belonging to Gabriel Tilmann, described as a close associate and friend of the former minister.

Reading from a portion of the contract agreement with Ethiopian Airlines, the witness, an investigator with the EFCC, stated: “The aircraft will depart from Addis Ababa (ADD) late evening of May 26, 2023, for it to be positioned early morning of May 27, 2023, at the Abuja (ABV) airport. The aircraft will stay at ABV airport for the static display of Nigeria Air livery until May 28, 2023. The aircraft will leave ABV airport early morning on May 29, 2023. The chartered flight will be operated by Ethiopian Airlines crew in Ethiopian Airlines uniforms. The Federal Government of Nigeria and Nigeria Air may put together local models who will be in Nigeria Air uniforms to pose for ceremonial pictures. The models may come to Addis Ababa so they may fly with the chartered flight to ABV.”

The witness told the court that the display of the aircraft at the Abuja International Airport was deliberately planned to coincide with the end of the first defendant’s tenure as Nigeria’s Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development on May 29, 2023, and to present the aircraft as evidence of the actualisation of his promise to revive Nigeria Air.

He further stated that after the less-than-72-hour display, the Nigeria Air logo was removed from the aircraft and it was returned to Ethiopian Airlines in Addis Ababa.

According to the witness, the investigating team also established that Ethiopian Airlines entered into a charter arrangement for the static display of the Nigeria Air livery for only three days, from May 27 to May 29, 2023. This was based on documents and information received from the airline in a letter dated June 12, 2023, sent in response to the EFCC’s request for information regarding Nigeria Air.

He added that although the contract was purportedly for the establishment of Nigeria Air, the charter agreement with Ethiopian Airlines was entered into on May 24, 2023—just five days before the expiration of Sirika’s tenure—and was solely for a static display of the Nigeria Air logo on an aircraft.

All documents tendered in evidence by the prosecution were shown to have been duly signed, authorised, and accompanied by certificates of identification. None of the counsel representing the four defendants objected to their admissibility.

Among the exhibits was a compact disc containing a voice note from the first defendant, Hadi Sirika, marked as Exhibit 37, which prosecution counsel applied to be played in court at the next adjourned date.

Further in his testimony, the witness disclosed that although the contract for the start-up of Nigeria Air was initially awarded to Tianaero Nigeria Limited for over ₦299 million on April 4, 2022, the company later received a contract extension on October 17, 2022, increasing the sum to over ₦599 million. He alleged that the extension was granted on the instructions and directives of the first defendant due to his relationship with the company’s alter ego.

According to him: “The investigating team arrived at this position when the phone of one Enitan Muyiwa Abel, who was a Permanent Secretary in the first defendant’s ministry, was analysed, revealing a voice note sent to the Permanent Secretary while the first defendant was in Spain, instructing him to ensure that the contract was awarded to Tianaero Nigeria Limited.”

Justice Oriji adjourned the matter until June 17, 2026, for the continuation of the trial.

Continue Reading

EFCC

EFCC Arraigns Three Over Alleged ₦10bn Fidelity Bank Fraud in Lagos

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arraigned three men and another suspect currently at large before the Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja over an alleged ₦10 billion fraud involving Fidelity Bank Plc.

The defendants, identified as Ibeh Emmanuel, Chidiebere Ihekoronye, Akubuo Chimuanya, and Austen Peaks Aniekan, who is currently at large, were brought before Justice Olubusola A. Okunuga on Wednesday on a five-count charge bordering on conspiracy, obtaining by false pretence, possession of fraudulent documents, and forgery.

According to the EFCC, the defendants allegedly conspired to fraudulently obtain ₦10 billion from Fidelity Bank Plc through forged documents and false representations.

One of the charges alleged that on or about April 16, 2026, the defendants, with intent to defraud, conspired among themselves to obtain the sum of ₦10 billion from Fidelity Bank Plc by falsely claiming that Maton Engineering Limited, which maintains account number 4011468821 with the bank, had issued an irrevocable standing order directing the reservation, blocking, and transfer of the funds in favour of Prospera Finance Limited, domiciled with Wema Bank Plc.

The anti-graft agency stated that the representation was false and that the defendants were fully aware of its falsity at the time it was made.

The commission further alleged that the defendants attempted to obtain the said amount based on the same purported instruction and false representation.

According to the charge, the alleged offences contravene Sections 1(1)(a), 8(a), and 1(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006.

The EFCC also accused Emmanuel of being in possession of a document purportedly issued by Fidelity Bank Plc confirming the existence of blocked funds amounting to ₦10 billion in favour of Prospera Finance Limited, which he allegedly knew to be false.

In addition, the defendants were accused of forging a document titled, “Confirmation of Ten Billion Naira (₦10,000,000,000.00) Blocked Funds in Favour of Prospera Finance Limited,” purportedly emanating from Fidelity Bank Plc.

The commission alleged that the document was knowingly fabricated without lawful authority, contrary to Section 365(1) of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.

When the charges were read to them, the defendants pleaded not guilty.

Following their plea, prosecution counsel, A.A. Usman, urged the court to fix a date for trial and requested that the defendants be remanded in a correctional facility pending the determination of their bail applications.

Justice Okunuga subsequently ordered that the defendants be remanded at the Ikoyi Correctional Centre and adjourned the matter until June 18, 2026, for the hearing of their bail applications and the commencement of trial.

The EFCC stated that investigations into the alleged fraud are ongoing, while efforts are being intensified to apprehend the fourth defendant, Aniekan, who remains at large.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 JaraJournal.