Connect with us

Judiciary

Court Declares Adenike Ajayi Sole Lawful Widow of Late Dr. Tosin Ajayi, Rejects Helen Prest’s Marriage Claim

Published

on

A Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja has declared Mrs. Adenike Oluwayemisi Ajayi the sole lawful widow of the late founder and Chief Executive Officer of First Foundation Hospital, Dr. Tosin Ajayi, bringing to an end a protracted legal battle over the deceased’s marital status and estate.

In a judgment delivered on Wednesday, Justice Oluwayoyin Odusanya granted all the reliefs sought by Mrs. Ajayi and her children, while dismissing the claims of former beauty queen Helen Prest that she was also a spouse of the late medical practitioner.

The dispute, which commenced in 2021 following Dr. Ajayi’s death on April 26, 2020, arose from competing claims over the deceased’s estate and the status of his surviving spouse.

The proceedings lasted nearly five years before the court delivered its verdict.

Justice Odusanya held that Mrs. Ajayi remained legally married to Dr. Ajayi until his death and that their monogamous marriage was never dissolved.

The court rejected arguments that the couple’s prolonged separation amounted to a termination of their marriage.

According to the judge, separation, regardless of its duration, does not automatically dissolve a legally valid marriage.

The court agreed with the submissions of counsel to the claimants, Kunle Adegoke, SAN, that the marriage between Dr. and Mrs. Ajayi subsisted throughout the lifetime of the deceased.

A major issue in the case was Helen Prest’s claim that she had contracted a Kalabari customary marriage with Dr. Ajayi.

However, the court found that she failed to provide credible evidence to support the assertion.

Justice Odusanya described the customary marriage claim as an afterthought, noting that Prest had adopted inconsistent positions in previous legal proceedings.

The court observed that in earlier suits, she had variously described herself as a common-law partner and, at another time, as being in a civil-law union with the deceased.

The judge further held that Prest was unable to establish essential elements of the alleged customary marriage, including the date and venue of the ceremony.

The court also noted the absence of documentary or photographic evidence to support her claim.

In addition, the court held that the alleged customary marriage would, in any event, have been invalid because evidence before the court showed that Prest was still legally married to her former husband, Mr. Davies, at the time she claimed to have married Dr. Ajayi.

Consequently, the court dismissed her claim to spousal status and affirmed Mrs. Ajayi as the only legally recognised spouse of the deceased.

Justice Odusanya also upheld Mrs. Ajayi’s entitlement to one-third of Dr. Ajayi’s personal estate and ruled that she is the only spouse entitled to apply for letters of administration over the estate.

The judgment effectively resolves the dispute at the High Court level and reinforces the legal principle that separation alone does not terminate a valid marriage in the absence of a formal dissolution.

With the ruling, Mrs. Ajayi and her children secured all the reliefs sought in the suit, while Helen Prest’s claims to recognition as a spouse of the late hospital founder were rejected in their entirety.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

UK Court Clears Alison-Madueke Of Bribery Charges

Published

on

The first woman president of OPEC and Nigeria’s former oil minister, Diezani Alison-Madueke, was cleared of bribery charges in a UK trial Wednesday, her defence lawyers said in a statement.

“Diezani Alison-Madueke was cleared of six charges of bribery at Southwark Crown Court on 17 June 2026, after a five-month trial,” defence lawyer Jonathan Laidlaw said in a press release.

The trial was brought by the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA), which targets serious organised and international crime, after a years-long investigation concerning alleged offences between 2011 and 2015.

Laidlaw told the jury at the London court in January that there was a “gross delay” in the charges being brought, resulting in “a great deal of material which would have established her innocence” being denied.

She had been accused of accepting “financial or other advantages” from individuals linked to two energy companies that had secured contracts with Nigeria’s state-owned petroleum corporation when she was the country’s oil minister.

Alison-Madueke had also been accused by prosecutors of enjoying a “life of luxury” funded by those interested in the lucrative oil and gas contracts.

Her lifestyle was described as involving chauffeur-driven cars, a private jet flight to Nigeria, and refurbishment work and staff costs at several London properties.

Her defence maintained that records proving her innocence had “disappeared” and that she could no longer access papers at home in Nigeria as British police had retained her passport since her first arrest 11 years ago.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Alleged ₦110.4bn Kogi Fraud: Witness Tells Court He Paid 50–60 Percent of Tax Consultancy Commission to Kogi Revenue Officials

Published

on

A prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Adoza Bello, on Wednesday, June 17, 2026, told the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Maitama, Abuja, that he paid between 50 and 60 percent of the commissions earned by his company from consultancy services rendered to the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service (KSIRS) to some officials of the agency.

The witness, who testified as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) eighteenth prosecution witness (PW18), made the disclosure before Justice Maryanne Anenih while being led in evidence by the Commission’s lead counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN.

The EFCC is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu on a 16-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering involving the sum of ₦110.4 billion.

The witness, who told the court that his companies were involved in information technology, software development, software implementation, marketing and tax automation services, recalled how he came in contact with the EFCC, stating that “my company had business dealings with the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service. It was in connection with that that my company was invited.”

The witness confirmed making statements to the Commission and explained that his company served as a consultant to the KSIRS, providing tax process automation, tax audits and advisory services on tax policy and strategy.

Asked whether the services rendered were free, he answered in the negative, explaining that his company was initially entitled to a 15 percent commission on tax collections exceeding ₦350 million.

“The agreement was to receive a 15 percent commission on transactions above ₦350 million. The agreement was later reviewed downward to five percent because the Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) had grown significantly and our operating costs became lower due to automation,” he said.

He further identified former KSIRS Chairman, Senator Yakubu Oseni, as one of the officials he dealt with during the consultancy arrangement.

Speaking on the disbursement of commissions received by his company, the witness disclosed that between 50 and 60 percent of the commissions were paid to certain stakeholders.

Asked whether such payments formed part of the consultancy agreement, he replied, “No.”

He added that the payments were made through bank transfers and cash transactions, stating that they were carried out based on directives from Senator Oseni through his Personal Assistant, Yusuf Abdulmumuni.

According to him, cash payments were also subsequently made on the instructions of Oseni’s successor, Aliyu Nda Salami, through Salami’s Personal Assistant, Abdulwahab.

The witness identified Exhibit X1 as the statement of account of Bespoke Business Solution domiciled in Zenith Bank Plc and Exhibit AD1 as the company’s Sterling Bank account statement.

He told the court that although the consultancy engagement commenced around 2016 and ended in 2017, the Sterling Bank account statement covered transactions from 2016 to 2022.

The witness further informed the court that one Jami’u Salihu was nominated by Senator Oseni as a signatory to the Bespoke project account maintained with Zenith Bank.

“Jami’u Salihu signs independently from me,” he said.

While reviewing transactions contained in Exhibit AD1, Pinheiro confirmed several inflows from the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service and corresponding withdrawals by Jami’u Salihu.

He identified an inflow of ₦92,444,992.60 on August 9, 2017, followed by withdrawals by Salihu. He also confirmed another inflow of ₦261,836,882.78 on August 14, 2017, with subsequent withdrawals by the same signatory.

The witness further confirmed transactions totaling ₦70 million paid to Efab Properties on August 17, 2017, comprising transfers of ₦25 million and ₦45 million.

However, he stated that he could not determine the property for which the payments were made because they were not initiated by him.

“I wouldn’t know which property was paid for because it was not my transaction,” he said.

The witness also identified credits totaling about ₦260 million received on September 11, 2017, and stated that certain payments made to Echis Materials, Quant, and Kalaz Ventures Limited were not his transactions but were carried out by Jami’u Salihu.

When asked whether there had been any complaints from the Kogi State Government regarding the performance of his company’s obligations under the consultancy arrangement, he answered: “No.”

During cross-examination by counsel to the first and second defendants, J.B. Daudu, SAN, the witness disclosed that the other shareholders in his company were M.K. and A.K.

He maintained that his company satisfactorily executed the services for which it was engaged and confirmed that Jami’u Salihu became a signatory to the company’s account following the execution of the necessary account documentation.

The witness also stated that, to the best of his knowledge, Senator Yakubu Oseni, Yusuf Abdulmumuni and Jami’u Salihu were still alive.

The prosecution also called its nineteenth witness (PW19), Jamilu Abdullahi, a Bureau de Change operator.

Led in evidence by Pinheiro, the witness identified himself as the owner of E-Traders International Limited, Kunfayakun Global Limited and De-Remita International Limited.

Abdullahi informed the court that he was familiar with Keyless Nature Limited and Ejadams Essence Limited through one of his customers, Abba Adaudu.

He also identified Exhibits AQ, AB2 and AK as statements of account belonging to his companies and his personal account.

The witness further confirmed knowledge of Forza Oil and Gas Limited, Whales Oil and Gas Limited and Alyeshua Solutions Services Limited.

Earlier in the proceedings, the court continued the cross-examination of Prosecution Witness 17 (PW17), Shenu Bello Bala, an estate agent and commodity trader.

Under cross-examination by defence counsel, the witness clarified that he was neither related to Ali Bello nor Yahaya Bello and was not from Kogi State.

“I happen to bear the name Bello. Ali Bello is my friend and business partner. I have known him for about 13 to 14 years, somewhere around 2012,” he said.

Following his cross-examination by counsel to all the defendants and in the absence of further questions, PW17 was discharged from the witness box.

Thereafter, Justice Anenih adjourned the matter until October 14, 15, 27 and 28, 2026, for continuation of trial.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Court Dismisses Yahaya Bello’s Bid to Quash ₦110bn Fraud Charge, Orders Trial to Continue

Published

on

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, presided over by Justice Maryann Anenih, has dismissed an application filed by former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Adoza Bello, seeking to strike out the charge brought against him in Charge No. FCT/CR/778/2024: FRN v. Yahaya Adoza Bello & 2 Ors.

Bello, through his lead counsel, J.B. Daudu, SAN, and a team of senior advocates, urged the court to strike out the 16-count charge on the grounds that the court lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

He also argued that the charge constituted an abuse of court process due to the pendency of a related case, Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/98/2024, before the Federal High Court.

Opposing the application, counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, argued that the application was misconceived and designed to unnecessarily delay the proceedings.

Pinheiro contended that the offences contained in the charge were based on provisions of the Penal Code and were, therefore, properly triable before the High Court of the FCT.

He further argued that the properties allegedly acquired with the proceeds of the offences, which form the basis of the charge, are located in Abuja, thereby conferring territorial jurisdiction on the court.

On the allegation of abuse of court process, EFCC counsel submitted that the charges before the two courts relate to different offences.

According to him, the case before the FCT High Court concerns allegations of criminal breach of trust and conspiracy under the Penal Code, while the case before the Federal High Court relates to alleged money laundering offences under the Money Laundering Act.

He further argued that the parties involved in the two cases are not the same, noting that Bello is the sole defendant in the Federal High Court case, whereas he is being prosecuted alongside two co-defendants in the FCT High Court matter.

In a ruling delivered on June 16, 2026, Justice Anenih agreed with the submissions of the EFCC and held that the court possesses the requisite jurisdiction to entertain the charge and that the proceedings do not constitute an abuse of court process.

The court subsequently dismissed Bello’s application.

A similar application filed by the third defendant was also dismissed for lacking merit.

Following the ruling, the court directed that the trial should continue, with the prosecution proceeding to call its 16th witness (PW16), who was present in court and ready to testify.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 JaraJournal.