EFCC
Alleged ₦36m Fraud: Court Reserves Ruling on Blessing CEO’s Bail Application Till June 9
Justice D.I. Dipeolu of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, on Friday, June 5, 2026, reserved ruling until June 9, 2026, on the bail application filed by social media influencer, Okoro Blessing Nkiruka (a.k.a. Blessing CEO), who is standing trial over an alleged ₦36 million fraud.
The defendant is facing a two-count charge filed by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), bordering on obtaining money by false pretence and stealing to the tune of ₦36 million.
During the hearing of the bail application, counsel to the defendant, P.I. Nwafuru, urged the court to grant his client bail on the most liberal terms.
Opposing the application, prosecution counsel, S.I. Suleiman, informed the court that the EFCC had filed a 28-paragraph counter-affidavit deposed to by the investigating officer, Bufa Regina Okangbe, on May 29, 2026.
“We rely on all the depositions contained therein and the exhibits attached. At some point during the course of the investigation, the defendant stopped honouring invitations extended to her by the Commission.
“We urge Your Lordship not to accede to the request of the defence and instead order an accelerated hearing of the matter,” Suleiman submitted.
After listening to arguments from both parties, Justice Dipeolu reserved ruling on the bail application until June 9, 2026.
Earlier in the proceedings, the prosecution presented its first witness, Bufa Regina Okangbe, an investigator with the EFCC. She narrated a trail of bank transactions, property records, and witness statements that allegedly revealed how the defendant received ₦36 million from the petitioner for a property she did not own.
According to Okangbe, the Commission received a petition, which was assigned to her team for investigation. She stated that a Bank Verification Number (BVN) search conducted on the defendant revealed several bank accounts linked to her.
“Following this, letters of investigation were sent to the banks, while another letter was forwarded to the Lagos State Land Bureau to determine whether the property belonged to the defendant.
“The Commission also wrote to the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) regarding the defendant’s company, Break or Makeup Limited.
“After analysing the defendant’s statements of account, she was invited to the Commission’s office and confronted with transactions traced to her and the petitioner.”
The witness further testified that the defendant made statements under caution in the presence of her lawyer and husband, admitting that the petitioner paid her the sum of ₦30 million.
Okangbe told the court that the response from the Lagos State Land Bureau revealed that the property in question did not belong to the defendant but to one Mr. Tunbosun Osobu.
“The Commission invited Mr. Osobu, who appeared with his lawyer and son. He confirmed that he had leased the property to the defendant for three years and that the lease expired in 2023 before it was renewed in 2025,” she stated.
The witness also informed the court that the petitioner submitted the lease agreement executed between the petitioner and the defendant, along with a tenancy acquisition form.
During the proceedings, prosecution counsel Suleiman sought to tender several documents through the witness, including the petition dated February 18, 2025; statements made by the defendant on December 10, 11, 12, and 16, 2025; the tenancy acquisition form submitted by the petitioner’s lawyer; the petitioner’s Zenith Bank statement of account in the name of Pipes and Barrel Limited; and the defendant’s GTBank and Access Bank statements.
However, defence counsel P.I. Nwafuru objected to the admissibility of the defendant’s statements, arguing that there was no endorsement indicating the presence of a legal practitioner during the recording of the statements. He also contended that no video recording of the statement-taking process had been produced before the court.
In response, Suleiman argued that the absence of a legal practitioner did not render an extra-judicial statement inadmissible.
“The law only requires the presence of a legal practitioner or any person chosen by the defendant. The statements are very key to this matter, and we urge My Lord to admit them in evidence,” he submitted.
On the issue of the bank statements, Suleiman maintained that all statements of account were accompanied by certificates of identification in compliance with Section 84 of the Evidence Act.
“The witness through whom the statements of account are being tendered is the investigating officer in this case, and the law recognises such authority as an exception to the hearsay rule,” he added.
In his ruling, Justice Dipeolu overruled the objections and admitted the documents into evidence as exhibits.
The judge held: “Section 17(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) clearly provides that a suspect’s statement may be taken in the presence of a legal practitioner of his or her choice, a representative of the Legal Aid Council, a representative of a civil society organisation, or any other person chosen by the suspect.”
Continuing her testimony, Okangbe stated that the petitioner, through the company account, paid a total sum of ₦36 million to the defendant.
According to her, ₦25 million was transferred into the defendant’s GTBank account, while an additional ₦11 million was paid into her Access Bank account for the lease of a property located at No. 1B Tunbosun Osobu Street, Lekki, Lagos.
She further testified that an analysis of the defendant’s bank accounts revealed several subsequent transfers, including ₦8 million to Mr. and Mrs. Osobu, ₦1.9 million to Beauty City by Lekki, ₦11 million to Lina Uzoma Okoro, the defendant’s mother, and ₦15 million to Kenneth Emeka Onuora.
Under cross-examination, the witness stated that the Federal Republic of Nigeria, being the petitioner in the criminal proceedings, was not privy to any settlement arrangement allegedly entered into between the defendant and the petitioner.
She also informed the court that she was unaware of any attempt by the defendant to refund ₦24 million to the petitioner, as earlier claimed by the defence.
According to the witness, the petitioner had already commenced renovation work on the property before the owner, Mr. Tunbosun Osobu, allegedly appeared and ejected them from the premises.
Justice Dipeolu subsequently adjourned the matter until June 9, 2026, for ruling on the bail application and June 22, 2026, for continuation of trial.
EFCC
Alleged ₦238.35m Fraud: EFCC Arraigns Man in Lagos
The Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, November 2, 2026, arraigned Adeseun Adeniyi Olukunle before Justice A. O. Okunuga of the Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos, over an alleged ₦238.35 million fraud.
Olukunle was arraigned on a 10-count charge bordering on obtaining money under false pretences, stealing and retention of stolen property.
The alleged offences are contrary to Sections 280 and 287 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2011, and Section 328 of the same law.
One of the counts reads: “That you, Adeseun Adeniyi Olukunle, Chanaiyah International Limited and Omotosho Abraham Aremu (at large), sometime in 2025 in Lagos, within the jurisdiction, converted the sum of ₦11,000,000.00 (Eleven Million Naira) to the use of Faniran Olusoji John, property of Temitope Bolarinde Samuel, aka Boteam Nigeria Limited.”
Another count reads: “That you, Adeseun Adeniyi Olukunle, Chanaiyah International Limited and Omotosho Abraham Aremu (at large), sometime in 2025, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction, converted the sum of ₦19,000,000.00 (Nineteen Million Naira) to the use of Omotayo Faniran, property of Temitope Bolarinde Samuel, aka Boteam Nigeria Limited.”
He pleaded not guilty to the charges when they were read to him.
Following his plea, prosecuting counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, urged the court to fix a trial date and remand the defendant in a correctional centre pending trial.
She informed the court that the second defendant, Chanaiyah International Limited, was controlled by Omotosho Abraham Aremu, who is currently at large. She consequently urged the court to enter a plea of not guilty on behalf of the company, a request that was granted.
However, defence counsel, Yusuf T. Nurudeen, informed the court that he had filed a bail application on behalf of his client and urged the court to grant the defendant bail on liberal terms.
In his ruling, Justice Okunuga granted Olukunle bail in the sum of ₦300 million, with two sureties in like sum.
The judge directed that one of the sureties must own landed property within the court’s jurisdiction, subject to verification by the court registrar. The sureties were also required to provide evidence of tax payment.
The case was adjourned until January 18, 19 and 20, 2027, for the commencement of trial.
EFCC
Hard Times Await Illegal Miners as Olukoyede Bags MINILS Fellowship Award
The Executive Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Ola Olukoyede, has vowed to intensify the crackdown on illegal mining by targeting financiers, mineral buyers, compromised public officials and other collaborators who profit from the illicit exploitation of Nigeria’s mineral resources.

Olukoyede made this known in Ilorin, Kwara State, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, while delivering a keynote address at a joint conference on illegal mining, corruption and climate implications, organised by the Michael Imoudu National Institute for Labour Studies (MINILS), Ilorin, in partnership with the Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA). The EFCC chairman was also conferred with a Fellowship Award by the institute.
Speaking on the theme, “Uprooting the Roots of Resource Theft: A Zero-Tolerance Approach to Mining Corruption and Increasing Insecurity in Nigeria,” the anti-corruption czar observed that despite Nigeria’s abundant mineral resources, including gold, lithium, tin, lead and zinc, the country had yet to maximise their economic benefits due to corruption, illegal exploitation and insecurity.
He stressed that mineral wealth could only become a national blessing if properly managed and protected from criminal exploitation.
He explained that illegal mining was not merely the work of individuals operating mining pits but involved sophisticated networks of local and international financiers, buyers, compromised officials, transporters and beneficiaries of illicit proceeds.
He therefore advocated an enforcement strategy that goes beyond arresting miners to identifying and dismantling the financial networks behind the criminal enterprise.
“A serious enforcement strategy must move from the pit to the purse,” he declared, adding that the EFCC would continue to follow the money, investigate financiers and facilitators, trace illicit proceeds and prosecute offenders based on evidence.
Giving an account of the Commission’s efforts, Olukoyede disclosed that between October 2023 and July 2026, the EFCC recorded 52 illegal mining cases within its specialised enforcement portfolio, resulting in investigations, prosecutions and convictions.
He also revealed that the Commission had secured the forfeiture of 102 tonnes of solid minerals.
He emphasised that illegal mining was not just an economic crime but could fuel extortion, smuggling, violence and other forms of criminality, thereby worsening insecurity in affected communities.
The EFCC chairman further called for stronger collaboration among mining regulators, law enforcement agencies, financial intelligence institutions, customs authorities, revenue agencies and host communities.
He maintained that effective information-sharing, joint intelligence and coordinated operations were essential to identifying the financiers and ultimate beneficiaries of illegal mining.
He also urged organised labour, traditional institutions, civil society organisations and the media to support efforts to promote transparency, decent work and accountability in the extractive sector.
Earlier, the Director-General of MINILS and chief host, Comrade Issa Aremu, commended the EFCC under Olukoyede’s leadership for its efforts to curb illegal activities and promote accountability in the country.
He also underscored the importance of the conference in advancing labour education and addressing contemporary challenges confronting workers and the environment.
In his remarks, the Chairman of HEDA Resource Centre, Mr Olanrewaju Suraju, described illegal mining, corruption and environmental degradation as interconnected challenges requiring collective action.
He stressed that organised labour must play a central role in Nigeria’s transition to clean energy to ensure that workers are not left behind.
He explained that the three-day engagement was designed to equip labour leaders with advocacy, skills development and collective bargaining tools while promoting a joint action plan for monitoring suspicious mining activities and a Green Accountability Campaign.
The highlight of the event was the conferment of a Fellowship Award on the EFCC chairman by MINILS in recognition of his contributions to the fight against corruption and related economic crimes.

EFCC
EFCC Uncovers Chinese-Operated Illegal Oil Refinery in Ogun
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has uncovered an illegal oil refinery allegedly operated by Chinese nationals in the Ogere area of Ogun State.
The operation, conducted on Saturday, October 31, 2026, by operatives of the EFCC’s Lagos Zonal Directorate 2, followed credible intelligence and surveillance by the Commission into the activities of illegal sludge oil refiners.

The refinery was deserted when EFCC operatives stormed the premises, following the Commission’s earlier clampdown on four illegal lithium processing plants in the area.

However, waste products from the refining process were discovered at the site.
During the raid, operatives also discovered underground tanks believed to have been used for heating and processing sludge oil.

Two of the tanks inspected contained substances suspected to be Automotive Gas Oil (AGO), commonly known as diesel.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the operators sourced sludge oil, also known as black sludge, from Warri, Delta State, and Port Harcourt, Rivers State, and transported it to the illegal facility in Ogere for processing.
Further investigations indicated that the operators subjected the sludge oil to intense heat, allowing lighter petroleum components to pass through a series of chambers and filters in a process believed to produce Automotive Gas Oil (AGO) for sale in the Nigerian market.
Security personnel at the facility reportedly told EFCC operatives that the Chinese operators had neither disclosed their identities nor identified the company behind the facility.

Consequently, operatives of the EFCC’s Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 have taken over the premises as investigations continue to establish the identities of the operators, determine ownership of the facility and ascertain the full extent of the suspected illegal activities and economic sabotage.
-
EFCC2 weeks agoAlleged ₦1.06bn Fraud: EFCC Secures Court Order to Freeze Suspect’s Account
-
EFCC7 months agoAlleged ₦1.4bn Oil Fraud: EFCC Re-Arraigns Nadabo Energy Boss, Ali Peters, Firm in Lagos
-
News8 months agoAgain, Dangote Refinery Hikes Petrol To ₦1,175/Litre, Diesel To ₦1,620/Litre — Report
-
EFCC1 month agoEFCC Hands Over Recovered ₦107m to Property Fraud Victim in Lagos
-
News9 months agoSenate Retains Two-Year Jail Term for PVC Trading, Raises Fine to ₦5m
-
EFCC8 months agoLagos Court Jails Man 18 Months for Defrauding Sterling Bank of ₦30m
-
Economy8 months agoNaira Rebounds To ₦1,363.5/$
-
Economy9 months agoNaira Closes in the Red at ₦1,341.35/$
