Judiciary
Alleged ₦110.4bn Kogi Fraud: Court Admits High Court Judgment as Evidence Against Yahaya Bello
Justice Maryanne Anineh of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Maitama, Abuja, on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, admitted into evidence a prior judgment of the FCT High Court against former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Adoza Bello.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu on a 16-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering involving the sum of ₦110.4 billion.
At the resumed hearing, prosecution counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, informed the court that he was concluding the examination-in-chief of Prosecution Witness 14 (PW14), Nicholas Okehone, an internal auditor at the American International School, Abuja.
“My lord, on the last adjourned date, I was examining PW14 and was about rounding up. The witness is present, and I can conclude so that we proceed to cross-examination,” he said.
Pinheiro also urged the court to defer all pending applications, including one challenging jurisdiction, to allow the trial to proceed without interruption.
During his testimony, Okehone confirmed his awareness of a suit filed by Ali Bello against the American International School, Abuja, and the judgment delivered in that matter. The prosecution then tendered a Certified True Copy of the judgment in Suit No. FCT/ST/CB/6574/2023, along with a payment receipt.
Counsel to the defendants, J.B. Daudu, SAN, and Z.E. Abbas, raised no objection to the admissibility of the documents. Justice Anineh subsequently admitted them in evidence, marking them as Exhibits AY and AY2, respectively.
While being led in evidence, the witness confirmed that Ali Bello was the claimant in the suit and was identified as the father of a prospective student, Zayyan Ali Bello. However, he clarified that Ali Bello was not the father of four other children referenced in the documents.
“From our records, Yahaya Adoza Bello is the father of the four children,” he stated.
Reading from the admitted judgment, the witness disclosed that arrangements were made for the payment of the children’s school fees up to graduation through an upfront payment plan.
He further stated that “the sum of $569,864.12 was paid into the school’s account domiciled in TD Bank,” adding that receipts were issued for the transactions and that the amount formed part of the total payment made.
Under cross-examination, defence counsel confirmed that the American International School is located in the Durumi District of Abuja and that the witness had served as an internal auditor for about eight to nine years.
The witness also told the court that his role did not involve direct interaction with students and confirmed that he did not represent the school in the suit from which the judgment was tendered.
Following cross-examination by both defence teams and in the absence of re-examination, the witness was discharged.
Thereafter, the prosecution moved an application dated October 7, 2025, seeking to stay or suspend the hearing of the first defendant’s motion challenging the court’s jurisdiction.
Arguing the application, Pinheiro relied on provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), emphasizing the need for a speedy and uninterrupted trial.
“My lord, this application essentially seeks to suspend the hearing of the first defendant’s motion. I urge your lordship to deliver a ruling and proceed to judgment,” he said.
Citing Sections 111, 221, and 396(2) and (3) of the ACJA, he argued that criminal trials should not be stalled by interlocutory objections.
“A holistic reading of these sections makes it clear that no criminal trial shall be interrupted by any form of objection,” he stated.
He further maintained that any objection raised after a defendant has taken a plea should be incorporated into the final address for determination at the judgment stage.
“Whatever issues you have, incorporate them into your final address so they form part of the issues your lordship will determine before judgment,” he added.
Pinheiro also argued that interlocutory injunctions have no place in criminal proceedings, noting that the trial, which commenced in 2014, had progressed substantially with several witnesses already called and documents tendered.
“It has become judicial policy that courts do not entertain interlocutory applications and injunctions because they interrupt trials,” he said, adding that the defendant, having taken his plea, could not subsequently challenge the court’s jurisdiction.
In response, defence counsel Daudu informed the court that the defence had filed a nine-paragraph counter-affidavit supported by a written address.
“With respect, we have relied on the relevant authority on this issue, the case of Shema v. FRN (2019),” he said, arguing that the prosecution’s position was misconceived.
Reacting, Pinheiro dismissed the applicability of the cited authority.
“Shema is irrelevant. It does not address Section 396 of the ACJA and predates several decisions of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal that I have cited,” he argued.
After hearing the submissions of counsel, Justice Anineh adjourned the matter to May 8, 2026, for ruling and continuation of trial.
EFCC
Alleged $6bn Mambilla Project Fraud: Witness Clarifies Certification of FEC Meeting Extracts
The Fifth Prosecution Witness (PW5) in the trial of former Minister of Power, Olu Agunloye, on Wednesday, June 10, 2026, clarified issues surrounding the certification of the extract of the minutes of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting of May 21, 2003, before Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Apo, Abuja, following a formal request by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for certified extracts of the meeting.
The former minister is facing prosecution on an amended seven-count charge bordering on alleged official corruption and the fraudulent award of the Mambilla Power Project contract worth $6 billion to Sunrise Power Transmission Company Limited.
The witness, Iliya John Iyakwari, an Assistant Director of Legal in the Federal Ministry of Justice, currently serving in the Federal Ministry of Power as an Assistant Legal Adviser since August 2014, stated during cross-examination by defence counsel, Adeola Adedipe, SAN, that the request for a certified copy of the extract of the FEC meeting of May 21, 2003, was received from the EFCC in July 2023.
He explained that the certification was eventually done in 2024 because, upon receipt of the request letter from the User Department, the Legal Department forwarded a memo to the EFCC dated July 27, 2023, but the initial copy sent to the Commission was not certified, prompting the EFCC to return it.
“It was after it was received by the EFCC in July 2023 that they realised the extract was not certified. So, in January 2024, a staff of the EFCC brought back Exhibit Three K to my Legal Adviser, and the name of the EFCC staff is Babangida.
“He brought it personally and reminded my director that it was not certified. My director then gave me the document to certify. That is why my lord will see on the face of the document that the date it was certified, January 26, 2024, is different from the date it was forwarded. It was in the process of certification that I mistakenly stamped the original forwarding letter dated June 27, 2023. After stamping the document, I gave it back to my director, who I believe handed it over to Babangida because I left them afterwards,” he said.
When asked whether his earlier testimony suggesting certification in June 2023 was contradictory, prosecution counsel, Abba Mohammed, SAN, defended the witness’ position, insisting that the testimony was not contradictory and that court records spoke for themselves.
“My lord, I object to this particular question anchored on Exhibit PW5A, which was just tendered in court. What I see in our record, and what I believe is reflected in the records of the court, is that in his explanation, he summarised that all these activities were done in June 2023; he never said the certification was done in 2023.
“This objection is founded on Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which is superior to the Evidence Act. We will rely on the record of the court, particularly line 16,” he said.
The witness was also asked whether the document tendered in court by Babangida during his testimony was a different extract of the FEC meeting from the one he certified.
The prosecution counsel again objected, arguing that the witness, in line with court procedure, was absent from the courtroom during Babangida’s testimony and therefore could not be cross-examined on a document that was not tendered through him. He cited the case of Buhari v. INEC & Others (2008).
Justice Onwuegbuzie adjourned the matter until June 18 and July 2, 2026, for the continuation of trial.
Judiciary
Alleged ₦2bn Nigeria Air Fraud: How Sirika Allegedly Used Ethiopian Airlines as Fake Nigeria Air – Witness
The 12th Prosecution Witness (PW12), Christopher Odofin, in the trial of former Minister of Aviation, Hadi Abubakar Sirika, on Wednesday, June 10, 2026, told Justice S.C. Oriji of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Abuja, how Sirika allegedly passed off an aircraft belonging to Ethiopian Airlines as the promised Nigeria Air by the government of the late President Muhammadu Buhari.
The decoy aircraft, adorned with the livery of the proposed Nigeria Air, landed on the tarmac of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on May 27, 2023, three days before the expiration of the Buhari administration, and was flown back to Addis Ababa on the morning of May 29, 2023, the handover date to the succeeding government.
Hadi Sirika is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on an amended six-count charge bordering on alleged abuse of office and misappropriation of public funds amounting to over ₦2 billion, alongside his daughter, Fatima Hadi Sirika; son-in-law, Hamma Jalal Sule; and Al Buraq Global Investment Limited.
The contract for the establishment of Nigeria Air was awarded to Tianaero Nigeria Limited, a company belonging to Gabriel Tilmann, described as a close associate and friend of the former minister.
Reading from a portion of the contract agreement with Ethiopian Airlines, the witness, an investigator with the EFCC, stated: “The aircraft will depart from Addis Ababa (ADD) late evening of May 26, 2023, for it to be positioned early morning of May 27, 2023, at the Abuja (ABV) airport. The aircraft will stay at ABV airport for the static display of Nigeria Air livery until May 28, 2023. The aircraft will leave ABV airport early morning on May 29, 2023. The chartered flight will be operated by Ethiopian Airlines crew in Ethiopian Airlines uniforms. The Federal Government of Nigeria and Nigeria Air may put together local models who will be in Nigeria Air uniforms to pose for ceremonial pictures. The models may come to Addis Ababa so they may fly with the chartered flight to ABV.”
The witness told the court that the display of the aircraft at the Abuja International Airport was deliberately planned to coincide with the end of the first defendant’s tenure as Nigeria’s Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development on May 29, 2023, and to present the aircraft as evidence of the actualisation of his promise to revive Nigeria Air.
He further stated that after the less-than-72-hour display, the Nigeria Air logo was removed from the aircraft and it was returned to Ethiopian Airlines in Addis Ababa.
According to the witness, the investigating team also established that Ethiopian Airlines entered into a charter arrangement for the static display of the Nigeria Air livery for only three days, from May 27 to May 29, 2023. This was based on documents and information received from the airline in a letter dated June 12, 2023, sent in response to the EFCC’s request for information regarding Nigeria Air.
He added that although the contract was purportedly for the establishment of Nigeria Air, the charter agreement with Ethiopian Airlines was entered into on May 24, 2023—just five days before the expiration of Sirika’s tenure—and was solely for a static display of the Nigeria Air logo on an aircraft.
All documents tendered in evidence by the prosecution were shown to have been duly signed, authorised, and accompanied by certificates of identification. None of the counsel representing the four defendants objected to their admissibility.
Among the exhibits was a compact disc containing a voice note from the first defendant, Hadi Sirika, marked as Exhibit 37, which prosecution counsel applied to be played in court at the next adjourned date.
Further in his testimony, the witness disclosed that although the contract for the start-up of Nigeria Air was initially awarded to Tianaero Nigeria Limited for over ₦299 million on April 4, 2022, the company later received a contract extension on October 17, 2022, increasing the sum to over ₦599 million. He alleged that the extension was granted on the instructions and directives of the first defendant due to his relationship with the company’s alter ego.
According to him: “The investigating team arrived at this position when the phone of one Enitan Muyiwa Abel, who was a Permanent Secretary in the first defendant’s ministry, was analysed, revealing a voice note sent to the Permanent Secretary while the first defendant was in Spain, instructing him to ensure that the contract was awarded to Tianaero Nigeria Limited.”
Justice Oriji adjourned the matter until June 17, 2026, for the continuation of the trial.
EFCC
EFCC Arraigns Three Over Alleged ₦10bn Fidelity Bank Fraud in Lagos
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arraigned three men and another suspect currently at large before the Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja over an alleged ₦10 billion fraud involving Fidelity Bank Plc.
The defendants, identified as Ibeh Emmanuel, Chidiebere Ihekoronye, Akubuo Chimuanya, and Austen Peaks Aniekan, who is currently at large, were brought before Justice Olubusola A. Okunuga on Wednesday on a five-count charge bordering on conspiracy, obtaining by false pretence, possession of fraudulent documents, and forgery.
According to the EFCC, the defendants allegedly conspired to fraudulently obtain ₦10 billion from Fidelity Bank Plc through forged documents and false representations.
One of the charges alleged that on or about April 16, 2026, the defendants, with intent to defraud, conspired among themselves to obtain the sum of ₦10 billion from Fidelity Bank Plc by falsely claiming that Maton Engineering Limited, which maintains account number 4011468821 with the bank, had issued an irrevocable standing order directing the reservation, blocking, and transfer of the funds in favour of Prospera Finance Limited, domiciled with Wema Bank Plc.
The anti-graft agency stated that the representation was false and that the defendants were fully aware of its falsity at the time it was made.
The commission further alleged that the defendants attempted to obtain the said amount based on the same purported instruction and false representation.
According to the charge, the alleged offences contravene Sections 1(1)(a), 8(a), and 1(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006.
The EFCC also accused Emmanuel of being in possession of a document purportedly issued by Fidelity Bank Plc confirming the existence of blocked funds amounting to ₦10 billion in favour of Prospera Finance Limited, which he allegedly knew to be false.
In addition, the defendants were accused of forging a document titled, “Confirmation of Ten Billion Naira (₦10,000,000,000.00) Blocked Funds in Favour of Prospera Finance Limited,” purportedly emanating from Fidelity Bank Plc.
The commission alleged that the document was knowingly fabricated without lawful authority, contrary to Section 365(1) of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.
When the charges were read to them, the defendants pleaded not guilty.
Following their plea, prosecution counsel, A.A. Usman, urged the court to fix a date for trial and requested that the defendants be remanded in a correctional facility pending the determination of their bail applications.
Justice Okunuga subsequently ordered that the defendants be remanded at the Ikoyi Correctional Centre and adjourned the matter until June 18, 2026, for the hearing of their bail applications and the commencement of trial.
The EFCC stated that investigations into the alleged fraud are ongoing, while efforts are being intensified to apprehend the fourth defendant, Aniekan, who remains at large.
-
Entertainment10 months agoSean Kingston sentenced to 3½ years in prison over $1 million fraud
-
Health11 months ago
Nigerian nurses stage seven‑day warning strike over pay, staffing
-
Economy10 months agoNigeria approves plan to refinance ₦4tn power-sector debt
-
Energy10 months agoDangote Refinery to deploy 4,000 gas‑powered trucks for distribution
-
Education11 months agoJAMB sets 2025/26 university cut‑off at 150, bars under‑16
-
Crime & Justice4 months agoBREAKING: Two Chinese Directors Jailed 46 Years Each Over ₦3.4bn, $2.5m Crypto Fraud in Lagos
-
Business4 months agoNigeria Revenue Service Collects ₦28.3trn in 2025, Sets ₦40.7trn Target for 2026
-
Crime & Justice4 months agoPolice Arrest 24-Year-Old Over ₦48.5m Romance Fraud in Lagos
